Tag Archives: performance

Example Architectural Decision – Storage Protocol Choice for a Horizon View Environment

Posted on by
Reply

Problem Statement

What is the most suitable storage protocol for a Virtual Desktop (Horizon View) environment using Linked Clones?

Assumptions

1. VMware View 5.3 or later

Motivation

1. Minimize recompose (maintenance) window
2. Minimize impact on the storage array and HA/DRS cluster during recompose activities
3. Reduce storage costs where possible
4. Simplify the storage design eg: Number/size of Datastores / Storage Connectivity
5. Reduce the total solution cost eg: Number of Hosts required

Architectural Decision

Use Network File System (NFS)

Justification

1. Using native NFS snapshot (VCAI) offloads the creation of VMs to the array, therefore reducing the compute overhead on the ESXi hosts
2. Native NFS snapshots require much less disk space than traditional linked clones
3. Recomposition times are reduced due to the offloading of the cloning to the array
4. More virtual machines can be supported per NFS datastore compared to VMFS datastores (200+ for NFS compared to max recommended of 140, but it is generally recommended to design for much lower numbers eg: 64 per VMFS)
5. Recompositions/Refresh activities can be performed during business hours, or at Logoff (for Refresh) with minimal impact to the HA/DRS cluster, thus giving more flexibility to maintain the environment
6. Avoid’s potential VMFS locking issues – although this issue is not as important for environments using vSphere 4.1 onward with VAAI compatible arrays
7. When sizing your storage array, less capacity is required. Note: Performance sizing is also critical
8. The cost and complexity of a FC Storage Area Network can be avoided
9. Fewer ESXi hosts may be required as the compute overhead of driving cloning has been removed thus reducing cost
10. VCAI is fully supported feature in Horizon View 5.3

Implications

1. The Storage Array supports NFS native snapshot offload to enable the full benefit of NFS (VCAI clones) however all other benefits remain without VCAI support.

Alternatives

1. Use VMFS (block) based datastores via iSCSI or FC/FCoE and have more VMFS datastores – Note: Recompose activity will be driven by the host which adds an overhead to the cluster. (Not Recommended)

Taking vSphere to the Next Level with Converged Infrastructure – vForum2013

Posted on by
Reply

vForumTitlePage

At this months vForum in Sydney, Australia, I will be presenting “Taking vSphere to the Next Level with Converged Infrastructure”.

The session discusses where the virtualization market is today along with problems that exist along the journey to 100% virtual and how converged infrastructure helps solve these challenges allowing vSphere architects and administrators to take their virtual environments to the next level.

The session is scheduled for Day 2 of the conference (October 22nd) at 11AM in Parkside 110A room.

I invite everyone who will be at vForum Sydney to attend the session, and for those of you who cannot make the event, the presentation will be posted on this blog along with follow up articles covering any questions from the session.

 

Competition Example Architectural Decision Entry 1 – TSM backup configuration for PureFlex environment?

Posted on by
Reply

Name: Ash Simpson
Title: Virtualization Architect
Company: IBM
Twitter: @Yipikaye1
Profile: VCP4

Problem Statement

Which is the ideal method for TSM backup for PureFlex environment? LAN free backup or LAN based backup or both?

Assumptions

1. IBM PureFlex hardware is used

2. Physical TSM server exists within PureFlex.

3. External (Virtual) Tape Library available on PureFlex SAN Fabric.

Constraints

1. Customer has selected PureFlex Infrastructure as hardware platform
2. IBM storage must be used – Storwize V7000 and IBM DS8000
3. ProtecTier VTL available and should be used

Motivation

1. Flexibility of Choice based on specific application requirements requirements.
2. The configuration to be deployed has the capability to support both.
3. LAN free backup is getting popular option in the industry.
4. LAN free backup negates the need for large backup windows.
5. PureFlex V7000 allows for FlashCopy Manager (FCM)
6. FCM is application aware for many critical Intel workloads such as SQL and Exchange.
7. All Backup I/O is retained within a single PureFlex Chassis

Architectural Decision

Deploy LAN free backup and LAN based backup infrastructure in PureFlex environments with LAN free backup via TSM for VE and FlashCopy Manager as the default. Should a particular application have the requirement for LAN based backup, the infrastructure can support it.

Host the Physical TSM server and an ESXi Host with the TSM for VE server (via affinity rule) in the same Chassis.

For the few servers requiring LAN based backup agents use affinity rules to prefer ESXi hosts in the same PureFlex chassis as the TSM server.

Alternatives

1. Provide LAN based backup only

2. Provide LAN free backup only.

Justification

1.Better utilization of network bandwidth in LAN free backup.
2.Improved performance for backup and restore operations is possible in LAN free backup.
3. LAN based backup is still required by certain applications, hence it is recommended to retain this feature.
4. Hosting TSM server in same chassis as proxy/agents prevents North/South network I/O.
5. FlashCopy Manager will reduce backup times by creating application aware snapshots on the storage array.

Implications

1. The hardware infrastructure will have to be configured for both LAN free and LAN based backup. For LAN free backup the SAN fabric in PureFlex system will be used for backup environment. The backup server transfers data from its storage directly to the tape device via FC.

2. Fibre Channel ports needs to be dedicated for backup traffic

3. Separate Zones needs to be configured in the Fibre Channel Switch module environment for backup traffic.

Back to Competition Main Page or Competition Submissions